Saikul v. State Of Haryana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No. 526 of 2018 DATE OF DECISION :- February 20, 2018 Saikul
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN Present:- Mr. Shiva Khurmi, Advocate for Mr. Sasrfraj Hussain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana.
*** Learned counsel for the petitioner states that since the petitioner has been granted bail by the Ilaqa Magistrate, Palwal under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C., this petition has become infructuous and he be permitted to withdraw the same.
Permission is granted. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE February 20, 2018 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Parvinder Singh 2018.02.23 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh