Mohan Singh Puri v. Presiding Officer Labour Court & ORS.

CWP No.11129 of 2012 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.11129 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.08.2015 Mohan Singh Puri ... Petitioner

Versus

The Presiding Officer Labour Court, Union Territory, Chandigarh and others ... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA

Present:

Petitioner in person.

Mr. Samrath Sagar, Advocate, for R-2.

1. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? RAJIV NARAIN RAINA, J.

The petitioner-in-person has made a statement after gauging the mind of the court on the question of jurisdiction in making the reference itself where the dispute was not espoused by the union of employees which may be fatal under section 2(k) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. He prays that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition. On reconsideration of his claim to bonus, if any, he would henceforth remain satisfied with the full and final settlement arrived at with respondent-3 in the Supreme Court in proceedings arising out of his dismissal from service and closure of litigation by payment of Rs.12 lacs and odd as compensation in lieu of reinstatement whereby the order of dismissal was converted into an order of simpliciter termination on account of having been rendered surplus, he MANJU 2015.09.08 15:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CWP No.11129 of 2012 (O&M) -2would have no further or subsisting claims including bonus against the respondents. However, if the petitioner has any other remaining and actionable grievance against respondent-2 he would be at liberty to pursue his legal remedies, if any available, and if any such proceedings are pending in a Court of law or are initiated it would be needless to say that both the parties, that is, the petitioner and respondent-2 would have their grounds of challenge in claiming relief and the opposite party would have right to defend itself on all pleas available in law.

With the limited relief set free for determination, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

(RAJIV NARAIN RAINA) JUDGE 28.08.2015 manju MANJU 2015.09.08 15:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh