High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRR/1100/2016dismissed

Nitin v. State Of Haryana And Another

2018-09-11Mr Justice Rajiv Sharma1 pages

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Revision No. 1100 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: 11.9.2018 Nitin .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

Present:

Mr. Susheel Guatam, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Tanuj Sharma, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Ankit Grewal, Advocate for respondent No. 2.

**** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J (ORAL) State counsel informs that the petition has become infructuous as the petitioner has been convicted.

Counsel for respondent No. 2 submits that this fact had been brought to the notice of the Court on the last date of hearing and counsel for the petitioner had sought time to verify the fact. Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has the right to argue on the juvenility.

The petitioner can raise the issue before the Appellate Court. The petition is dismissed as infructuous.

(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE September 11, 2018 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No GURPREET SINGH 2018.09.13 14:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh