Jugraj Singh And ANR. v. State Of Punjab And ORS.
CRM-M-6552-2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-6552 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision : February 28, 2017 Jugraj Singh and another ... Petitioners
VERSUS
State of Punjab and others ... Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present:
Petitioners in person with Mr. Durga Dutt Sharma, Advocate.
SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) This petition is for seeking protection of life and liberty of petitioners, who alleged to have married against the wishes of respondents No. 4 and 5, mother and brother of petitioner No.2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has limited his prayer for taking appropriate action in accordance with law on the representation dated 17.02.2017 (Annexure P-9) made by petitioner No.2. It has been stated that both the petitioners are major. The date of birth of petitioner No.1-Jugraj Singh is 07.09.1996 as per copy of Matriculation Examination Certificate (Annexure P-1) and that of petitioner No.2-Ranjit Kaur is 06.06.1988 as per copy of Matriculation Examination Certificate (Annexure P-4). They got married on 17.02.2017. Photographs of marriage are Annexure P-8.
In view of the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, but without expressing any opinion on the validity of marriage of petitioners, petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2Senior Superintendent of Police, SAS Nagar Mohali to look into the Sachin Mehta 2017.02.
CRM-M-6552-2017 -2representation dated 17.02.2017 (Annexure P-9) and take appropriate action in accordance with law, on receipt of copy of this order along with representation in his office.
However, it is made clear that this order will have no effect on the validity of alleged marriage of the petitioners or on any other civil or criminal proceedings instituted against them. (SURINDER GUPTA) February 28, 2017 JUDGE Sachin M.
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable:
Yes/No Sachin Mehta 2017.02.28 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH