Mool Chand And ORS v. State Of Haryana And Others

CRM-M-27216-2024 (O&M) -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-27216-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 29.08.2024 MOOL CHAND AND ORS ....Petitioner(s)

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present :

Mr. S.K. Tripathi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG Haryana.

Mr. Virender Kumar, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 6. ***** SANJIV BERRY, J. (ORAL) By way of present petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, petitioners seek quashing of FIR (Annexure P1) and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise/settlement dated 29.03.2023 and 30.09.2023 (Annexures P-2 and P-4) executed between the parties. Details of the FIR are as follows: FIR No.

Dated Sections Police Station 27.02.2022 147, 149, 201, 323, 341, 325 and 506 IPC Bilaspur, District Gurugram 2.

With the intervention of respectables and elderly people of the society, the parties have arrived at a settlement vide compromise deed dated 29.03.2023 and 30.09.2023 (Annexures P-2 and P-4). The matter was referred to the Court below for recording of statements of the parties and to report with respect to genuineness of the compromise arrived at between the parties. The learned 
 

 





  vide report dated SANDAL SHARMA 2024.08.31 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CRM-M-27216-2024 (O&M) -2-





















23.08.2024 has apprised this Court that the compromise arrived at between the parties is genuine and without any pressure. The petitioners have also deposited the cost of Rs.15,000/- and 5,000/- in compliance to the order dated 01.07.2024 and 24.07.2024.

3.

Respondent Nos.2 to 6 are represented by their counsel and do not oppose the compromise.

4.

In view of the aforesaid report of the learned 
 

  



, Pataudi and in view of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in "Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another", 2012(4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and "Narinder Singh and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Another", (2014) 6 SCC 466, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose can be served by keeping the criminal proceedings pending, since the complainant has himself compromised the dispute with the petitioners/ accused persons.

5.

In the circumstances, the present petition is allowed. FIR No.98 dated 27.02.2022 under Sections 147, 149, 201, 323, 341, 325 and 506 IPC registered at Police Station Bilaspur, District Gurugram (Annexure P-1) and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, are hereby quashed on the basis of compromise qua the present petitioners. (SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 29.08.2024 S.Sharma(syr) i) Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes/No ii) Whether reportable?

Yes/No SANDAL SHARMA 2024.08.31 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment