Lalit Mehta & ANR. v. State Of Haryana And ANR.
CRM No.M-6644 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-6644 of 2017 Decided on: 19.04.2017 Lalit and others ....Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE REKHA MITTAL Present :
Mr. S.S. Walia, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Dimple Jain, AAG, Haryana.
Ms. Mansi Bansal, Advocate for respondent No.2. REKHA MITTAL, J. (Oral) Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have already joined investigation in compliance with interim bail granted by this Court and they are ready to face the proceedings, in accordance with law.
Counsel for the State concedes to this fact.
Counsel for the complainant/respondent No.2 has got no objection if interim bail granted to the petitioners is made absolute. In view of the above, the petition is allowed and the interim bail granted to the petitioners is made absolute subject to the conditions incorporated in the order dated 01.03.2017. Disposed of accordingly.
19.04.2017 (REKHA MITTAL) yakub JUDGE Mohd. Yakub 2017.04.19 14:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh