Tejinder Singh & ANR v. State Of Punjab

CRM-M No. 6645 of 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No. 6645 of 2017 DATE OF DECISION :- January 11, 2018 Tejinder Singh alias Mannu and another

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN Present:- Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Veneet Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ramandeep Sandhu, Sr. DAG., Punjab.

*** It is a case of version and cross version of the incident. The F.I.R. in this case was lodged on the basis of statement of Tejinder Singh, whereas he along with his brother Palwinder Singh are accused in the cross version. The incident is said to have taken place outside the shop of present petitioners. Two persons from their side had suffered injuries in the incident. They are stated to have joined the investigation and recovery has been effected from them. Tejinder Singh has submitted an affidavit that he does not hold any Passport whereas Palwinder Singh has submitted his Passport to the investigating officer.

Learned State counsel in instructions from HC Navtej Singh states that petitioners are not required by the police for further investigation. Parvinder Singh 2018.01.11 17:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M No. 6645 of 2017 Under such circumstances, the interim bail granted to the petitioners on 1.3.2017 is made absolute, subject to their fulfilling conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

The petition stands allowed accordingly.

(H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE January 11, 2018 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Parvinder Singh 2018.01.11 17:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh