Navdeep Singh And ANR v. State Of Punjab And ORS

-12023:PHHC:049624 CRM-M-31483-2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-31483-2021 Date of Decision:-April 11, 2023 Navdeep Singh and another ......Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN ****

Present:

Mr. Anshul Sharma, Advocate for Mr. G.S. Madaan, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Pankaj Khullar, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. Anurag Arora, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. **** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No. 75 dated 07.05.2020, registered under Sections 452, 363, 354, 294, 323, 506, 511, 188 and 34 of Indian Penal Code at Police Station Navi Bradari, District Police Commissionerate Jalandhar (Annexure P-1) and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 29.04.2021 (Annexure P-2). Keeping in view the fact that the parties entered into a compromise, this Court vide order dated 07.12.2022 directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court for getting their statements recorded in that regard. Pursuant thereto, a report dated 27.02.2023 has been received from the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jalandhar, stating that the compromise arrived at between the parties is voluntary and the same is without any pressure, coercion or undue influence. PARUL 2023.04.13 09:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

-22023:PHHC:049624 CRM-M-31483-2021 Learned State Counsel and learned counsel for respondent No.2-complainant admit the factum of compromise and submit that they have no objection to quashing of the FIR on that basis. Perusal of the aforesaid report establishes that the parties have amicably settled their dispute, and continuance of criminal prosecution in such a situation will be an exercise in futility, as the chances of ultimate conviction are bleak. The power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. can be exercised in such matters. It has been held by Supreme Court of India in cases Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and another 2012(10) SCC 303 and Narinder Singh and others v.

State of Punjab and another 2014(6) SCC 406 that criminal cases having overwhelmingly civil character, particularly those arising out of commercial transactions or matrimonial relationships or family disputes, should be quashed when the parties have resolved their disputes among themselves in a bona fide manner. Consequently, this petition is allowed. FIR No. 75 dated 07.05.2020, registered under Sections 452, 363, 354, 294, 323, 506, 511, 188 and 34 of Indian Penal Code at Police Station Navi Bradari, District Police Commissionerate Jalandhar (Annexure P-1) and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, are hereby quashed qua the petitioners, subject to payment of cost of Rs. 10,000/- to be deposited by the petitioners jointly and Rs. 10,000/- to be deposited by respondents No.

2 and 3 within one month from today in the following account:- Account Name - Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association Lawyer's Family Welfare Fund.

Account No. - 41564846387 Bank Name - SBI High Court Branch.

(ALOK JAIN) JUDGE April 11, 2023 Parul Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No PARUL 2023.04.13 09:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document