Rajesh v. Ut Of Chandigarh And ANR

108+201

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRR-1260-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 25, 2024 RAJESH ....Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

UT OF CHANDIGARH AND ANR ....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL

Present:

Mr. Vipan Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Navneet Jindal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Akun Sheemar, Advocate for Mr. Anil Kumar Lamdharia, Advocate for UT Chandigarh.

None for respondent No.2.

**** SANDEEP MOUDGIL , J.(ORAL) CRM-37560-2024 This is an application under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 for withdrawal of the case Notice in the application.

Mr. Akun Sheemar, Advocate for Mr. Anil Kumar Lamdharia, Advocate for UT Chandigarh accepts notice on behalf of UT Chandigarh. It has been submitted before this Court vide instant application that the victim has attained the age of 14 years and might have forgotten the incident which happened way back at his age of 05 years. It has been deemed appropriate at the part of the petitioner that it would be better not to SANGEETA 2024.09.26 20:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRR-1260-2016 (O&M) pursue the instant petition any further, hence, the same is sought to be withdrawn.

Permitted to do so.

CRR-1260-2016 In view of order passed in CRM-37560-2024, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

(SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE 25.09.2024 Sangeeta Whether reasoned/speaking:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No SANGEETA 2024.09.26 20:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document