Ritik Sharma v. State Of U.T Chandigarh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-25213-2020 (O&M) Date of decision : 08.09.2020 Ritik Sharma

...Petitioner

Versus

State of U.T. Chandigarh

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN

Present:

Mr. Jitender Singh Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. A.M. Punchhi, PP with Mr. Anupam Bansal, Advocate for U.T., Chandigarh.

**** JITENDRA CHAUHAN, J. (Oral) The matter has been taken up through video-conferencing in the light of the pandemic COVID-19 situation and as per instructions. Reply filed by learned counsel for U.T., Chandigarh today in the Court, is taken on record. Copy thereof has already been supplied to the learned counsel opposite.

After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition.

Dismissed as withdrawn.

08.09.2020 (JITENDRA CHAUHAN) Jyoti-II JUDGE Whether speaking / reasoned :

Yes No Whether Reportable :

Yes No JYOTI 2020.09.08 03:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document