Dinesh Kumar v. State Of Haryana And ORS.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.2493 of 2015 Date of decision: 18.01.2016 Dinesh Kumar ..Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and another ..Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
1. Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment? Yes/No
2. To be referred to reporters or not? Yes/No
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No
Present:
Ms. Alisha Soni, Advocate for Mr. Shalender Mohan, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Trishanjali Sharma, AAG, Haryana for respondent No.1 - State.
None for respondent No.2.
Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present revision petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as having become infructuous.
18.01.2016.
(DAYA CHAUDHARY) neetu JUDGE NEETU RANI 2016.01.19 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh