Kuldeep v. State Of Haryana
!""#$%$&' (#)*
' +,
-- ,
!
"#!
$!% &!
' "!
"#! ((((( - ,*
, )*+ ,! ,,-,+ .$ #
!%# $ #,!+,/0!+12 *3 # 3 $ $ # 4 , . .$ $.4% !# 0
$$ 5$ 4 !
.# ## $ 6 # 4% $" .6. 7$!. 8 7 . 9$$735% # !
. $ 4 $ # $ # 9$$.
/
# . ++++,+ 9$$.
# # 4 # $$/ ANKUR GOYAL 2023.03.03 16:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
....
. ## .# :+++,+ ! # #+;33. $0
6 #.
6 $ .8 # .#"# "
$ ,<,=,+- 6!9$$. 4 $43 $ % $ # ! # # +; 33 1+,,+-. $/
## 6 #4
. " ,,+,+1 4 / . /
##
,++,+ 6 ##
"
$ ,<,=,+- 6 !. ?
# #
#+;33 $
## ."! . 6 #.#
$ # $#/## 9$$6. # # # 6 " ++++,+ .!4 # 4 # #4"$$ $#6 ! $ # 1+,,+-.4 ## .* 4 4
##
,<,=,+-6 #/## 9$$. 6 ! # # +; 33 . 4 #
" 4
$ #
....
# 4
$#/## 9$$.4 .# 6 ! #.#
$ . 4 "! $ #+;33 - # 4 4
# 1 6 ! ?
.# # @+A . $9$$. # 4# Bmain trialC. $#+;33 5$".# ## ## @A. # 4# #
# $ #
#+;33 < " 3 0#
$
!> 4 " # $4 $
## . " 4 #
$ . 8 6 ! $
$ 4 " #
#
$# 9$$6
$
# = ." 4 # 4
#4 "
$ ## .#
4 7. 4# $64 # # 4 $
#..
....
$ # "
$4# $## ;
. ?
43 0#.
BI. Whether the trial court has the power under section 319 of CrPC, 1973 for summoning additional accused when the trial with respect to other co accused has ended and the judgment of conviction rendered on the same date before pronouncing the summoning order?
II. Whether the trial court has the power under section 319 of the CrPC, 1973 for summoning additional accused when the trial in respect of certain other absconding accused (whose presence is subsequently secured) is ongoing/pending, having been bifurcated from the main trial?
III. What are the guidelines that the competent court must follow while exercising power under section 319 CrPC, 1973DC +, @**A " ++ 6.$"4 .
/ B30. One other aspect which is necessary to be clarified is that if the trial against the absconding accused is split up (bifurcated) and is pending, that by itself will not provide validity to an application filed under section 319 CrPC, 1973 or the order of Court to summon an additional accused in the earlier main trial if such summoning order is made in the earlier concluded trial against the other accused. This is
""# $ % &'(
))*)) so, since such power is to be exercised by the Court based on the evidence recorded in that case pointing to the involvement of the accused who is sought to be summoned. If in the split up (bifurcated) case, on securing the presence of the absconding accused the trial is commenced and if in the evidence recorded therein it points to the involvement of any other person as contemplated in section 319 of CrPC, 1973, such power to summon the accused can certainly be invoked in the split up (bifurcated) case before conclusion of the trial thereinC + 6 4"# 4$
## # 4 "
$ # 4 # 4 " ## *
.. ##
$ . 8 4 . 4$F 9$$ 6 !
3 . $ + **## $ . " + 6 # ?
# $ " #4 # . $ $ +- * .# # " # $#4$" 4 "!# 4 $ *#!#4 #4 # .
4$ # F#$$
.#
....
.
4 $ 6 ! # ?
. $" +1 *".4"!"
+< $ #
#
(#)* - , Ankur G5$7 ' G4