Sarvesh Kumar And Others v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12422-2026 Date of decision: 24.04.2026 Sarvesh Kumar and others ....Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR

Present:

Mr. Viresh Dahiya, Advocate and Ms. Sonakshi Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Piyush Khanna, Addl.A.G., Haryana.

HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) 1.

The present civil writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus for revision of the wages of the petitioners whose wages/salary/pay is stagnant since the year 2022 after their deployment under the office of respondent No.2 and further to release of increment/revision benefits to the petitioners which are pending since the year 2022 which had to be revised annually as per clause V of the notification dated 19.01.2022 (Annexure P-3). Further, for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 & 4 to decide upon the representation (Annexure P-7) of the petitioners. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he would be satisfied if the representation (Annexure P-7) of the petitioners is decided by respondent No.4 by passing a speaking order in a time bound manner. 3.

Learned State counsel, appearing on advanced notice, submits that he has no objection in case a direction is issued to respondent No.4 for timeNEHA 2026.04.27 10:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh

CWP-12422-2026 -2bound consideration and decision of the representation of the petitioners by passing a speaking order.

4.

Therefore, in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, respondent No.4 is directed to consider the representation (Annexure P-7) of the petitioners and pass a speaking order, after affording them an opportunity to be heard, within a period of 03 months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Further, the decision taken thereof shall be conveyed to the petitioners. Needless to say, if the petitioners are found entitled to the relief sought, the same shall be granted forthwith by respondent No.4.

5.

Disposed of, accordingly.

(HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 24.04.2026 Neha Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No NEHA 2026.04.27 10:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh