Gurinder Singh v. State Of Punjab




   
   



 !"!#$%&% '(!#)(*!#+, 

!

!#( -("'"

*

 '#.

/ #) # ,(  "0#)# "

 $  12 % *
 
3 
 

      

  


        !

 

 "  ! # $$$


  Vide order dated 10.08.2021, this Court had granted interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of order dated 10.08.2021, the petitioner has joined investigation. 3.

This fact has not been disputed by the learned counsel for State of Punjab. However, learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for respondent No. 2 have opposed the bail. They further submit that in case this Court is inclined to give the bail to the petitioner then it should be subject to the strict and stringent conditions. 4.

Given the nature of allegations, no pre-trial incarceration is required. Without commenting on the case's merits and the circumstances peculiar to this case, the petitioner makes a case of release on bail.

5.

Given above, the present petition is allowed. The order dated 10.08.2021 is hereby made absolute, subject to the following conditions:-

1. Within ten days, the petitioner shall mention details of all assets, held either individually or jointly, including bank balances, fixed deposits, DEMAT Accounts, to the Investigator and its copy to the complainant/victim(s).

2. Petitioner shall surrender all his weapons, fire arms, ammunition, if PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2022.04.22 17:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

 

  any, along with the arms licence to the concerned authority within ten days from today and inform the Investigator about the compliance. However, subject to the Indian Arms Act, 1959, he shall be entitled to renew and take it back in case of acquittal in this case.

( ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE April 22, 2022 paramjit %

&  '&! %  '&! PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2022.04.22 17:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document