M/S Vijay Sharma And Harjinder Singh Through Its Sole Proprietor And ANR. v. State Of Punjab And ORS.

IN T THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CWP-13803-2022 (O&M Date of Decision: 06.11.20 R SINGH AND ANR.

. . . . Petition CHANDIGA M) M/S VIJAY Y SHARMA AND HARJINDER ners Vs.

PUNJAB AND ORS.

STATE OF . . . . Responde nts **** HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SA

CORAM:

ANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ANJAY VASHISTH **** None for the petitioners.

Present

Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl. A.G G., Punjab.

**** PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Ora SANJEEV al) ne appears for the petitioners.

1. No on

2. It is i informed by counsel for the Sta ate that the excise policy, which h is under r challenge in the present petitio on, has elapsed with the efflux of time, and therefore the present w writ petition has been render red infruc ctuous.

3. In vi iew of above, writ petition is dismissed as having becom me infruc ctuous.

4. All pe ending applications also stand di isposed of accordingly.

(SA NJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA A) JUDGE (SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE November 0 6, 2024 Mohit goyal Yes/No Yes/No

1. Wheth

2. Wheth her speaking/reasoned?

her reportable?

MOHIT GOYAL 2024.11.06 18:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document