Krishan Kumar v. State Of Haryana And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-12016-2024 (O&M) Decided on :22.05.2024 KRISHAN KUMAR . .petitioner

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS . . . Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI PRESENT: Mr. A. P. Bhandari, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Nain, AAG, Haryana.

**** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (Oral) 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that without examining the actual record, the impugned order dated 15.04.2024 (Annexure P/7) has been passed by the respondents declining the benefit of regularization of service to the petitioners and that too by ignoring the settled principle of law.

2.

Notice of motion.

3.

Mr. Harish Nain, AAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and on instructions from Mr. Alok, Clerk, O/o DFO, Kaithal submits that impugned order dated 15.04.2024 (Annexure P-7) be treated as withdrawn and liberty be given to the respondents to pass a fresh order on the basis of the record available by keeping in mind the settled principle of law on the said issue of seeking regularization under the policy dated 01.10.2003 and the said order will be passed within a period of 08 weeks from today.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that keeping in view the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondents, present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further. RIYA 2024.05.24 11:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-12016-2024 (O&M) -2 2225.

Ordered accordingly.

(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE 22.05.2024 Riya Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No RIYA 2024.05.24 11:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document