Ram Lal v. State Of Punjab And Others

YOGESH SHARMA 2019.10.30 09:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-14422-2019 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-14422-2019 (O&M) Date of decision : 24.10.2019 Ram Lal ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Present:

Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Vikas Mohan Gupta, Addl. A.G., Punjab.

**** AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL) Mr. V.M. Gupta, Addl. A.G., Punjab, on instructions from Mr. Mandeep Singh Dhillon, Tehsildar, Kharar and Mr. Jas Karan Singh, Naib Tehsildar, Majriyan, who are present in Court, submits that certified copy of the mutation dated 20.12.2017 could not be supplied to the petitioner, on the premise, that the then, Naib Tehsildar, namely, Varinder Pal Dhoot, had though passed the order, but it was not made available, resulting into, suo moto enquiry by the Deputy Commissioner, Mohali, in the month of February 2019. As far as dereliction of duty is concerned, the matter is being enquired into, therefore, delay was not intentional, but owing to the aforesaid fact. However, he brought the certified copy of the order as well as mutation, which are being handed over to the learned counsel for the petitioner, in Court today.

YOGESH SHARMA 2019.10.30 09:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-14422-2019 (O&M) The grievance of petitioner, in such circumstances, no longer, subsists, thus, present writ petition is disposed of, as having been rendered infructuous.

( AMIT RAWAL ) JUDGE 24.10.2019 Yogesh Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No