Surinder Singh Alias Surinder Kumar v. State Of Haryana
CRM-M No. 24533 of 2019 -1In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh CRM-M No. 24533 of 2019 Date of Decision: 09.1.2020 Surinder Singh @ Surinder Kumar ......Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL
Present:
Mr. Sunil Sihag, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Rahul Mohan, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. S.P.S.Aulakh, Advocate for the complainant.
**** HARNARESH SINGH GILL , J. (ORAL) The petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No. 40 dated 14.3.2017 under Sections 148, 149, 302, 323, 324, 325, 506 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 registered at Police Station Shahzadpur, District Amabla. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the present case challan was presented in June 2017 but till dated the material witnesses, especially the doctor, have not been examined. Learned State counsel, on instructions from Sub Inspector Dev Chand, submits that only one witness i.e. Jaspal Singh has been partly examined.
Since challan was presented in June 2017, the trial Court is directed to examine the material witnesses expeditiously. GURPREET SINGH 2020.01.10 18:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh
CRM-M No. 24533 of 2019 -2The petition stands disposed of accordingly. (HARNARESH SINGH GILL) JUDGE January 09, 2020 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :
Yes/No Whether reportable :
Yes/No GURPREET SINGH 2020.01.10 18:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh