Satya Parkash Gupta And ANR v. Manoj Dayal And ORS

KAPIL 2015.10.10 10:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRR-2792-2014 (O&M) [1] *** In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh CRR-2792-2014 (O&M) Date of decision: 05.10.2015 Dr. Satya Prakash Gupta and another ......Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and other ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA

Present:

Mr. N.S. Dhillon, Advocate for the petitioners.

**** SABINA, J.

Respondents No.2 to 5 had faced trial in a complaint filed by the petitioners under Section 417, 420, 423, 465, 468, 471, 474 and 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860. Trial Court vide order dated 28.01.2012 ordered the acquittal of respondents No.2 to 5. The appeal filed by the petitioners against the said order was dismissed by the Appellate Court vide order dated 25.04.2015. Hence, the present petition by the complainants.

I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and have gone through the record available on the file carefully.

The case of the complainants, in brief, was that Dr.

KAPIL 2015.10.10 10:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRR-2792-2014 (O&M) [2] *** Rajbir Singh has been appointed as a Professor in the Institute of Mass Communication and Media Technology on the basis fake experience certificate. Courts below while ordering the acquittal of the accused held that there was no material on record that the experience certificate of Dr. Rajbir Singh was fake. Further there was nothing on record to suggest that the petitioners had been authorized by the University to file the complaint.

In these circumstances, Courts below had rightly ordered the acquittal of respondents No.2 to 5. Hence, no ground for interference by this Court is made out. Dismissed.

October 05, 2015 (SABINA) kapil JUDGE