Poonam Chopra v. Sachin Dhamija And ANR
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Revision No. 1640 of 2016 Date of Decision: 26.2.2018 Poonam Chopra .....Petitioner
Versus
Sachin Dhamija and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY
Present:
None for the petitioner.
Mr. B.K.Bagri, Advocate for respondent No. 1.
Ms. Mahima Yashpal, AAG, Haryana.
**** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J (ORAL) Counsel for respondent No. 1 states that a compromise had been effected and the entire amount has been received by the petitioner. There was no appearance on behalf of the petitioner on the last date. Even today no one has not put in appearance on her behalf. It has been informed that the complainant has gone abroad. It appears that the petitioner is no longer interested in the petition. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE February 26, 2018 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :
Yes/No Whether reportable :
Yes/No Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2018.02.28 10:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh