← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRWP/4666/2026disposed of

Vikas Sharma v. State Of Punjab And Others

2026-05-06Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal2 pages

CRWP-4666-2026 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH 109+230 CRM-W-655-2026 in/and CRWP-4666-2026 Date of decision : 06.05.2026 VIKAS SHARMA ... PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present:- Mr. Shivang Berry, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rohit Hans, DAG, Punjab *** H.S. Grewal, J.(Oral) CRM-W-655-2026 This application has been filed under Section 528 of BNS (corresponding Section 482 of Cr.P.C) for placing on record additional documents on record as Annexures p-11 to P-17. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and additional documents as Annexures P-11 to P-17 are ordered to be taken on record.

Main case:

1.

This petition is filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus or any appropriate writ, order or direction directing respondents No. 3 and 4 to protect the life and personal liberty of the petitioner and his family, and to provide adequate police protection, including deployment of armed security personnel, in view of grave threats allegedly received from designated terrorist groups under the Unlawful RENU RAWAT 2026.05.07 16.14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CRWP-4666-2026 (O&M) Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 with a further prayer that directions be issued to the respondents to register an FIR against Paramjit Singh Takhar, Jasbir Singh Johal, Harminder Narwal and their accomplices on the basis of the petitioner's complaints and threat communications and an interim direction for protection during the pendency of the present petition. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is receiving threats from terrorist groups and apprehends danger to his life and personal liberty at the hands of one Paramjit Singh Takhar. 3.

I have heard the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.

4.

In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the State to look into the matter, consider the threat perception, and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law. (H.S.GREWAL) 06.05.2026 JUDGE renu Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No RENU RAWAT 2026.05.07 16.14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh