High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/7260/2017allowed

Amit Kumar Sharma v. State Of Haryana And ANR.

2017-04-20Mrs. Justice Raj Rahul Garg2 pages

Crl. Misc. No. M-7260 of 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-7260 of 2017 Date of decision : 20.04.2017 Amit Kumar Sharma ......Petitioner versus State of Haryana and anr.

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. Sanjeev Verma, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. D.R. Singla, DAG, Haryana **** RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral) Reply filed by learned State counsel in the Court today is taken on record.

Quashing of FIR No. 228 dated 16.07.2010 under Sections 406/498-A/506/323 IPC, registered at Police Station Sohna, District Gurgaon, is being sought on the basis of compromise deed dated 17.03.2016 (Annexure P-2) Respondent No. 2 got married to petitioner on 23.04.2008. Due to temperamental differences, both the parties could not live together as husband and wife. The relationship between them became strained and F.I.R was registered against the petitioner on account of harassment and humiliation caused by the petitioners on the pretext of bringing less dowry by respondent No. 2.

However, the matter has now been duly compromised, on the basis of compromise deed dated 17.03.2016 (Annexure P-2). GAURAV ARORA 2017.04.25 10:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Crl. Misc. No. M-7260 of 2017 In compliance of order dated 03.03.2017, report dated 23.03.2017 of Sub Divn. Judicial Magistrate, Sohna has been received in this regard. As per report, separate statement of the complainant and petitioner has been recorded and they stated that the matter has been duly compromised between them. The compromise has been entered voluntarily. The complainant has no objection if the F.I.R be quashed against the petitioner. Further the complainant has taken divorce from the petitioner. Consequently, in view of the status report dated 23.03.2017 and in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in cases of Dr. Arvind Barsaul etc. versus State of Madhya Pradesh and another 2008(2) RCR (Criminal) 910, Madan Mohan Abbot vs. State of Punjab 2008(2) RCR (Criminal) 429 and the law laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Kulwinder Singh and Ors. vs. State of Punjab and another 2007(3) RCR (Crl.) 1052, no useful purpose would be served in prolonging the litigation.

Accordingly, FIR No. 228 dated 16.07.2010 under Sections 406/498-A/506/323 IPC, registered at Police Station Sohna, District Gurgaon, is quashed along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom qua petitioner.

The petition stands disposed of.

20.04.2017 (RITU BAHRI) G Arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No GAURAV ARORA 2017.04.25 10:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh