Sudesh v. State Of Haryana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRR-1927-2016 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.09.2018 Sudesh ..... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana ..... Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Arjun Singh Yadav, AAG, Haryana.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Custody certificate filed by learned State counsel is taken on record. Office to tag the same at the appropriate place. Despite the case having been called twice, the petitioner has gone un-represented.
Perusal of the file shows that on the previous date also, the petitioner had gone un-represented. Therefore, it can safely be presumed that the petitioner or his counsel is no more interested in pursuing the instant revision.
Resultantly, this revision is dismissed for want of prosecution. September 11, 2018 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2018.09.13 17:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document