Gurpreet Singh Bhullar v. State Of Punjab


 2023:PHHC:110209



   
   

 !"!#$ %  

 

 

    

  
 
 
 





  !" #$!%&   

   !"

 $  '!$  

 

 

 (  ) 

  *

  & &   

&  +     & ,- #  # 

&./0 (11 (2 3
3

$ 

& -34$-
-$135$(,2 /   #$(53$

    &    *   '

  &   *    
    

  3
35
3
-$7  &

  7

"

 "+  &  

$   # 8#

  &  # $   & & 

 "    

 * " 

%



"Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the incident took place at the spur of the moment. He further submits that the allegations of grievous injuries having been inflicted upon

  the person of Munish Kumar Bansal were upon by coaccused Karan Sandhu and Davinder Singh Khara. He submits that the petitioner had no role to play and was just present at the spot along with his friends when the sudden fight took place. He submits that the petitioner is a young person aged 29 years. It is also been contended that co-accused-Karan Sandhu has already been arrested. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is willing to join investigation and abide by any condition imposed by this Court. Learned counsel representing the State of Punjab on instruction from ASI Jasvir Singh, who is present in the Court, submits that the injury was grievous in nature as a result of which Section 325 IPC had been added. Learned counsel has not been able to pinpoint as to which injury has been declared dangerous to life and submits that Section 307 IPC had been added on the initial statement of the complainant.9 -  : &  

"

  

&"  &  3
35
3
-$ 





%

  &   

%



  &+  ,  :    & $          + 7+   %     "

$ $' + 

   &$ 

'

%  $   *   $7 &  *   &$7

       & "   

 %

 



%

    & 7  

%



  &+ ;$  

 & $"

   

   <  

%

 "&  &  

 

  1  / % 7 %$ 

7 

 "  3
35
3
-$ " &   &

 7

&  ,-=
> #  #  0  $

 &  

 "

  & &         "$    7      +  * & &  "  &


' () *+*"

,        "