Iqbal Singh Rasulpur v. State Of Punjab And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH 112-2 Decided on : 28.04.2026 CM-2831-LPA-2026 in/and LPA-1158-2026 (O&M) IQBAL SINGH RASULPUR ...APPELLANT

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS . . .RESPONDENTS CM-2833-LPA-2026 in/and LPA-1160-2026 (O&M) IQBAL SINGH RASULPUR ...APPELLANT

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS . . .RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA PRESENT: Mr. H.C. Arora, Advocate for the appellant in both cases.

**** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (Oral) CM-2831-LPA-2026 CM-2833-LPA-2026 1.

The prayer in the present applications is for condonation of delay of 12 days in filing the present appeals. 2.

Keeping in view the averments enumerated in the applications, which are duly supported by an affidavit, the same are allowed. Consequently, the delay of 12 days in filing the present appeals is condoned. LPA-1158-2026 LPA-1160-2026 1.

After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the question as to whether or not the information sought under RIYA 2026.04.29 16:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CM-2831-LPA-2026 in/and LPA-1158-2026 (O&M) and Connected cases Section 8(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 can be provided to the appellant after the conclusion of the trial, has not been decided by the learned Single Judge while passing the impugned order dated 11.03.2026 and therefore, the present appeals may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty to file a review application before the learned Single Judge.

2.

Ordered accordingly.

3.

Pending civil miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand disposed of.

4.

A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of other connected case(s).

(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE ( DEEPAK MANCHANDA ) JUDGE 28.04.2026 Riya Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No RIYA 2026.04.29 16:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document