Rohit Kumar v. State Of Haryana

Crl. Misc. No. M-7626 of 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

Sr. No. 212 Case No. : Crl. Misc. No. M-7626 of 2017 Date of Decision : March 14, 2017 Rohit Kumar ....

Petitioner vs.

State of Haryana ....

Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL.

* * * Present :

Mr. J. S. Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Manish Bansal, DAG, Haryana.

* * * DEEPAK SIBAL , J.

:

Through this petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the petitioner seeks grant of regular bail in FIR No. 16 dated 28.01.2017, registered under Sections 148, 149, 323, 427, 506 IPC (Sections 325 and 307 IPC added later on), at Police Station Sector 20, Panchkula. Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that co-accused Rohit Thakur, who has been attributed an identical role as the petitioner, had earlier approached this Court through Crl. Misc. No. M-5467 of 2017 and has already been admitted to regular bail by order of this Court dated 23.02.2017.

That being so, on the principle of parity, the petitioner also deserves to be admitted to bail.

Monika 2017.03.14 17:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Crl. Misc. No. M-7626 of 2017 Bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Panchkula.

Nothing observed herein above shall be considered to be an expression of opinion by this court on the merits of the case. If the petitioner is found indulging in any other criminal act or misusing the concession of bail granted by this Court, it would be open to the State to seek cancellation of bail granted through this order by filing an appropriate application before the competent Court/this Court. ( DEEPAK SIBAL ) JUDGE March 14, 2017 monika Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No.

Monika 2017.03.14 17:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document