Sunita And ANR. v. Bachittar Singh And ORS.
!
"#$# %& "
' ( )* +
,$-
& ./
0- 0 0 0
! " #$ %
&&&& 0 0
-
(
) *+ ''
,**-
!
'0++(1 %" ( % 2 (2 "
"3
0
0
( *'
*0 ,**/ ) /+,- % " $ "
"
" ( 4 %56#'*'- (1 " 6" "
" 7 8 9
% 1
"
6"
) 8 ) "
6" )
:$% )
"( 8
/
" "
;
< " ( "
) # ' = " >?
, = ) ) 4 %56#'*'->? ,$ 4 ', )" "
" ")" >? /= 4 ')
>? ;
-
( ) "
(1 "3
"
-* ***3#
"3
"
0 000 0/ 0 .
"#
#
"
) " )
6" ) "
!
'0++) substituted by Section 164 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (Act 32 of 2019 w.e.f 01.04.2022) and compensation should be enhanced as per the substituted statutory provision i.e. Section 164 of the Act.
iii) That the present case is covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in FAO No.4301 of 2006, titled as "Akaljit Kaur and Others Vs. Parveen Kumar and Others." wherein the claim under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 was converted to Section 164 ! '0++ /, ,*'0)
*'
*;
,*,,(1 1 8"
5@( Supreme Court in the case of Ram Murti and others Vs. Punjab State Electricity Board [2022(4) TAC 738] )herein it was held that Section 164 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 /, ,*'0)
*'
*;
,*,,provides for payment of compensation in case of death in the amount of Rs.5 lakhs and in the case of grievous hurt of Rs.2.5 lakhs.
#$ %"
1
)
1 ) 1(
" "
(1 ( 1(
+ $
)
)
"
"
6" ))01 "
((
( 1 "
1 "
-* ***3#( )
8 !
'0++)( (1 '.; !
'0++ /, ,*'0)
*'
*;
,*,,"
(
( 1
'.;
( ( (
(1 "
% '' ) '.;
+
1"
"
" - - '* <
% in FAO No.4301 of 2006, titled as "Akaljit Kaur and Others Vs. Parveen Kumar and Others" held as under:-
!"#$%&'
! " #!
" # $ (")*+,-*
.
) /00
) % #&'!#'# % ( % * %
+ % ,
"
- .
% *
+ % % $
+ +
!
" ! # ! !$ %& '
( &* + )
1 31
) ! 4
! 0 # 0
! ' -./
'
0 " , & '
& !
, &
'
! ' 1( 14.
Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
0 0
: =
3#
C 34 =
( C 34