Joginder Singh v. Union Of India And Others

102 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.12045 of 2024 Date of Decision:22.05.2024 Joginder Singh ....Petitioner vs.

Union of India and another ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Present:

Mr. Sumeet Singh Brar, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Bhawna Thakur, Central Govt. Counsel for the Union of India *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to re-issue him passport.

2.

Ms. Bhawna Thakur, Central Government Counsel for Union of India, who on advance notice is present in Court, at the outset, submits that application of the petitioner already stands closed. If he files a fresh application seeking passport, it would be decided expeditiously. 3.

Counsel for the petitioner agrees to the aforesaid arrangement. 4.

In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition stands disposed of.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 22.05.2024 paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable:

No PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.05.22 00:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document