Balihar Singh v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.25925 of 2020 Date of Decision: 26.04.2022 Balihar Singh ..... Petitioner versus State of Haryana ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Vishal Thakur, Advocate for Mr. Sudhir Rana, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Manish Bansal, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. G. S. Sandhu, Advocate for the complainant.

ANOOP CHITKARA J.

Vide order dated 03.09.2020, this Court had granted interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 03.09.2020, the petitioner has joined the investigation. 3.

This fact is not refuted by learned counsel appearing for the State.

4.

Learned counsel appearing for the complainant has strenuously opposed the bail.

5.

Given the nature of allegations, no pre-trial incarceration is required. Without commenting on the case's merits and the circumstances peculiar to this case, the petitioner makes a case for release on bail. RITTU 2022.04.28 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M No.25925 of 2020 -26.

Given above, the present petition is allowed. The order dated 03.09.2020, is hereby made absolute subject to the condition that the order dated 19.04.2022 shall be complied with within 10 working days from today. If he fails to comply, it shall be open to the complainant as well as the State to file an application for cancellation of bail granted to the petitioner. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 26.04.2022 rittu Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No RITTU 2022.04.28 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document