Darshan Kaur v. Satnam Singh
!"#
$% &
'
(
)"# !
*
'+, -. ) /'
( -. )
)
*
'* ) 3 (
!, 16 ))* ) ) *(
' 7 * ) 5 * ')*)
) 82, - 7' "- #, !7,
1 ( '' * ) *(
* ', ' '
5 2, ! +
1' 6 * ))* *( ). ', '' 9*:
!7, -'*
(.
'
;
1. 5 1* ( / 5 * 1' ))* 5 ' * .
!, * ( ')*, *( ))* * **5 *
(1 ))* * *( < 1 ' *:, !7 '
;
') .*1* , ))(
'
.*1*6 , :
=-=
+ (,
1' , ( ) 56 5 *6 ) ( ( )*'6 - 7' "- #, !7,
., -'* / 1' , 1 1*6 !7, 5 * 1 .*1*6 :
=-=,
3 ' *( ))* *( 5 *
. , 5 ) (
' >))( ), * * ) 1'
. ) ( )*'6
(, 5 1:
), 1( ) ''( , * ) (
' /
5., 1' , **5 4 1,
( *16 1< '1*6 /
+ 5 * , ))
; ;;
+ %. -,
?;
*( (.@
6 (. 4, , **5( "# 5 )) ) )5@ ) ( '
( )., 6 )
, 1< , ) , 6 ) *(**6 1 , , ' ;;,
) A "1# 4,
. ' 5( ) ( '
). A "#
6 *, )6 ( , 6 ( '
5 * (*, 1* 'A "#
*6 '.1*A "# ) 1* '( 2A "#
)6 )' -, 6 *5 + (. .A "(# (* '
.*6 4' , (* * * ** + "#, "# "#, 6 '1* + "1#, 5 ' '1* + "# "#, )6 ', 1 : '1*
+ "(#, (. (* * 6 )
4' ', :** 4'
' ;; *
6 ;, * "#, ** (. * )6 ))( (.
). *6 (. )6 ) )5 , B
6 )*C
)1 *5A )1 *5,
1* '
!.
** 3 '1* 6 **5( , 6
: )
@ "
# * A "# , '
, . )6 ' :5
5** 3 A "# )) . )6
1 ) A "2# . )6
(
A "# . )6
(
' * 'A ";# ) )
, 1< , ) D '
,
.( '', * !7 ' '
;
1 * 3 5 1* (, 1 .*1*6 , :
=-=, * *( ))* *( ')*) + 4' '
' 82, - 7', !7, !, ( )*'6 - - F', 0 ), >(*
'
(
2 , )' , . )6 )1:, 5 ) , %4829- %4829F
/=1*
)' +,
!"#$%"$""& " '("#$"# )(*
-+
2
* ?-( * "#
; + %. -,
6 (. 4, 5 )) ) )5 ) ( '
( 6 )
, 1< , ) 6 ) *(**6 1 , , '
;;
) * "1# "(#
; )6 ' ( *( (.G In the case of M. Chandra vs. M.Thangamuthu, (2010) 9 SCC 712, Hon'ble The Supreme Court of India considering the requirement of Section 65 of the Evidence Act, held that "if secondary evidence is admissible, it may be adduced in any form in which it may be available, whether by production of a copy, duplicate copy of a copy, by oral evidence of the contents or in another form. The secondary evidence must be authenticated by foundational evidence that the alleged copy is in fact a true copy of the original."
F , '
"
( #$*"%# )"(* "#$ * " ;#
;
, /=1*
)' +
1. * 1* *
;
6 ) 1 , )6 1* ', 1( 16 *, ) ) -.(
,
'). '
3 ,
.( ) 4 1 1 * ( )*'6 (,
5 1* !7 , *6 ) genuinely unable to get produced the original documents through PSPCL, for no fault of his, it being a situation beyond his control. In view of the exceptions to the rule, requiring primary evidence, that are designed to provide relief in such cases, ) . **5
* 1. ' ' ', 6 ( ,
3 1* ( *
*5
( ' 1( *'
, ' ), 3 * ,
!, ) )' ) ' ))*,
*16 ) 1< '1*6 ) **5 (*6
1. ' *6 < ),
4) '
+ , ')*9(.
):(9
H
)1*
H