Sarita v. Sate Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-12570-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 24.04.2026 Sarita ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana & Ors ... Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI Present :

Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral) 1.

The present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for setting the notices dated 15.09.2025 (Annexure P-4) and 22.09.2025 (Annexure P-5) issued under Sections 24(1) and 24(2) of the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 alongwith the consequent proceedings being wrong, illegal and against the provisions of law.

2.

Notice of motion.

3.

Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3/State. Mr. Sandeep Siwach, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.4-Gram Panchayat.

4.

Learned counsel for respondent No.4-Gram Panchayat, on instructions, states that they would be withdrawing the notices (Annexures P-4 and P-5) and would be availing their remedies as available in law. 5.

In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for respondent No.4-Gram Panchayat, the learned counsel for the petitioner states YOGESH SHARMA 2026.04.27 10:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.

Chandigarh

CWP-12570-2026 (O&M) that he does not wish to press the present writ petition at this stage. Permitted to do so.

6.

Dismissed as not pressed at this stage. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.

( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE 24.04.2026 Yogesh Sharma ( RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI ) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO YOGESH SHARMA 2026.04.27 10:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.

Chandigarh