Ravi v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH 204) CRM-M-26314 of 2020 Date of Decision: 07.01.2021 Ravi

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH Present:- Mr. R.S. Mamli, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Surender Singh, AAG, Haryana.

Amol Rattan Singh, J. (Oral) Case heard by video conferencing.

In terms of order dated 24.11.2020 a reply dated 31.12.220 is on record, filed by the DSP, Ladwa, District Kurukshetra, annexing therewith statements of the injured Sumit son of Vinod Kumar, as also his wife and father, to the effect that he was admitted to the PGI, Chandigarh, on 01.04.2020 and discharged on 03.04.2020 and that he is now feeling well. That being so, with the petitioner having been in custody since June, 2020, with the trial still to effectively commence, without making any comment on the actual merits of the case, the present petition is allowed, with the petitioner ordered to be enlarged on bail, upon his furnishing adequate bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court/CJM/Duty Magistrate concerned.

07.01.2021 (AMOL RATTAN SINGH) vcgarg JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No VIKAS CHANDER 2021.01.10 12:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document