Bajaj Processpack Limited v. State Of Haryana

CWP-12549-2026 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12549-2026 Date of Decision: 24.04.2026 Bajaj Processpack Limited

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. Akshay Kumar Dahiya, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Akshit Pathania, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 151 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 is seeking direction to learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Sonipat to decide its Execution Petition No.19 of 2025 in a time bound manner.

2.

The petitioner claims that an Arbitral Award dated 24.06.2024 was passed in its favour. It filed Execution Petition No.19 of 2025 before learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Sonipat on 28.01.2025 which is still pending.

3.

Hon'ble Supreme Court in Periyammal (dead) through legal representatives and others v. V. Rajamani and another, (2025) 9 SCC 568 has directed all the Courts to adjudicate execution applications within 6 MOHIT KUMAR 2026.04.24 16:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

CWP-12549-2026 -2months. The Supreme Court is still seized of the matter and time and again directions are issued, thus, no direction of this Court is warranted. 4.

Disposed of.

(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 24.04.2026 Mohit Kumar Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MOHIT KUMAR 2026.04.24 16:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.