Surjit Singh v. State Of Haryana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRR-2367-2016 (O&M) Date of decision: 15.01.2020 Surjit Singh ..... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana ..... Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Amrik Narwal, DAG, Haryana.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Despite the case having been called twice, petitioner has gone un-represented.
Perusal of file shows that on the previous date also i.e. 20.08.2019, none put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, it can safely be presumed that the petitioner or his counsel are not interested in pursuing the instant revision. Dismissed for want of prosecution.
A copy of this order be sent to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri, who shall issue warrants of arrest against the petitioner to undergo remaining part of the sentence. January 15, 2020 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2020.01.16 19:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document