High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRR/3542/2015dismissed

Sharukh Khan v. State Of Haryana And ANR.

2015-12-10Mrs. Justice Rekha Mittal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRR-3542-2015(O&M) Date of Decision : 10.12.2015 Sharukh Khan ...... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana & another ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present :

Mr. Vishal Garg Narwana, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. S.S. Pannu, D.A.G., Haryana.

Mr. Vaibhav Prashar, Advocate for respondent No.2.

***

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) This revision has been filed against concurrent conviction of the petitioner under Sections 354-A/354 D IPC whereby he was sent to Special Home Ambala for a period of one year by the Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Faridabad for the commission of aforesaid offences.

Custody certificate by way of affidavit of Ranvir Singh, Superintendent, Special Home, Ambala has been filed and the same is taken on record. Copy supplied to the counsel opposite. POOJA SHARMA 2015.12.11 11:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh

CRR-3542-2015(O&M) -2The allegations were that the minor petitioner used to constantly harass and tease the minor prosecutrix. The Juvenile Justice Board and the Appellate Court have sent him to special home for a period of one year.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner be released on probation. Learned counsel for the complainant states that it is not a case where the petitioner should be released on probation because he was constantly harassing the prosecutrix. Learned counsel for the petitioner has then prayed that some leniency may be shown in the sentence. In my considered opinion the interest of justice would be met if the period of the petitioner in the Special Home is reduced to 5 months.

With the above modification in the sentence, the petition is dismissed.

Since the main case has been decided, the Criminal Misc.Application, if any, stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) December 10, 2015 JUDGE sunita/Pooja Sharma-I POOJA SHARMA 2015.12.11 11:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh