Lalita Sahrawat & ANR v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH 302-A CRM-M-790-2017 (O&M) Date of decision: 10.10.2022 LALITA SAHRAWAT & ANR

...Petitioners

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL Present: - Mr. Paras Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rahul Mohan, DAG Haryana.

Ms. Bhawna Thakur, Advocate for the complainant. **** HARNARESH SINGH GILL , J.

(ORAL) This petition has been filed for quashing of FIR No.335 dated 28.06.2016 under Sections 406, 420 and 34 IPC, registered at Police Station Shahabad, District Kurukshetra, along with all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a compromise dated 01.10.2020 has been effected between the parties and that, on the basis of the said compromise, the above noted FIR has already been quashed, vide order of the even date passed in CRM-M605-2022. Thus, the present petition has become infructuous. Learned State counsel and counsel for the complainant do not dispute the aforesaid factum.

Dismissed as having become infructuous.

10.10.2022 (HARNARESH SINGH GILL) Aman Jain JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking?

Yes/No Whether reportable?

Yes/No AMAN JAIN 2022.10.12 17:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment