D.R. Foods Ltd., v. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd.
CWP No. 16886 of 2022 -1122 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 16886 of 2022 Date of Decision: 03.08.2022 D.R. Foods Ltd.
-Petitioner
Versus
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and others -Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Present:
Mr. Govind Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
**** RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J. (Oral) Petitioner has preferred this writ petition for the issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to refund Rs.1,06,800/- to the petitioner on account of over charging.
Precisely for the claim in question, petitioner has submitted a legal notice dated 04.07.2022.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied in case its pending legal notice is directed to be decided by respondent No.1 by passing a speaking order in accordance with law at the earliest. In view of nature of order which this Court proposes to pass, there is no necessity of issuing any notice to the respondents.
JYOTI SHARMA 2022.08.03 05:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
CWP No. 16886 of 2022 -2This writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to consider the pending legal notice dated 04.07.2022 got issued by the petitioner and pass appropriate order in accordance with law, preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 03.08.2022 (RAJ MOHAN SINGH) Jyoti Sharma JUDGE
1. Whether speaking/reasoned :
Yes/No
2. Whether reportable :
Yes/No JYOTI SHARMA 2022.08.03 05:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment