High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/7952/2017disposed of

Heena And Another v. State Of Haryana And Others.

2017-03-08Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj2 pages

CRM-M-7952-2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-7952 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision : March 08, 2017 Heena and another ... Petitioners

VERSUS

State of Haryana and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Petitioners in person with Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Advocate.

SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) This petition is for seeking protection of life and liberty of petitioners, who alleged to have married against the wishes of respondents No. 6 to 8, parents and brother of petitioner No.1. Learned counsel for the petitioners has limited his prayer for taking appropriate action in accordance with law on the representation dated 06.03.2017 (Annexure P-5) submitted by petitioner No.1 to Superintendent of Police, Kurukshetra. It has been stated that both the petitioners are major. The year of birth of petitioner No.1-Heena is 1994 as per copy of Aadhaar Card (Annexure P-1) and that of petitioner No.2-Khushi Ram is 1991 as per copy of Aadhaar Card (Annexure P-2). They got married on 06.03.2017 Photographs of marriage are Annexure P-4.

In view of the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners, but without expressing any opinion on the validity of marriage of petitioners, petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Kurukshetra to look into the representation dated 06.03.2017 Sachin Mehta 2017.03.08 16:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-7952-2017 -2- (Annexure P-5) and take appropriate action in accordance with law, on receipt of copy of this order along with representation in his office. However, it is made clear that this order will have no effect on the validity of alleged marriage of the petitioners or on any other civil or criminal proceedings instituted against them. (SURINDER GUPTA) March 08, 2017.

JUDGE Sachin M.

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Sachin Mehta 2017.03.08 16:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH