Vijay Kumar v. State Of Haryana And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No.15022 of 2011 Date of Decision.06.01.2015 Vijay Kumar .......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ......Respondents

Present:

Mr. Rajiv Kataria, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Keshav Gupta, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. S.K. Verma, Advocate for respondent No.8.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he will work out the alternative remedy which is available namely preferring an appeal against the order passed by the Director. 2.

The writ petition is disposed of with liberty as aforesaid. If there is delay in preferring the appeal, the time taken by the petitioner in bona fide prosecution of the writ petition may be taken note of for exclusion and the appeal may be disposed of on merits which he canvasses for.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE January 06, 2015 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2015.01.07 12:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh