Rajesh Kumar v. State Of Haryana And ORS

CWP No. 13582 of 2020 - 1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No. 13582 of 2020 Date of Decision: 04.09.2020 Rajesh Kumar Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Present:

Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sumit Gupta, Addl. AG, Haryana.

**** AVNEESH JHINGAN, J (Oral):

The matter is taken up for hearing through video conference due to COVID-19 situation.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not pressing the present petition and would peruse representation already made through e-mail on 24 th August, 2020. It is submitted that the fact of making representation is pleaded in the writ petition, however, the copy has not been attached.

Mr. Sumit Gupta, Addl. AG, Haryana appearing on advance notice submits that in case representation is made the same would be considered in accordance with law and would be decided expeditiously. In view of above, the present petition is disposed of. Petitioner would be at liberty to avail remedies in accordance SHAM SUNDER 2020.09.04 03:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Sector-1, Chandigarh

CWP No. 13582 of 2020 - 2with law if aggrieved of order passed.

In view of Clause 8 sub-clause (xiv) of the transfer policy, it is clarified that mere pendency of representation will not be considered as an impediment for the petitioner to join the new station. However, his joining would be subject to the outcome of the decision on the representation. [AVNEESH JHINGAN] JUDGE th September, 2020 sham

1. Whether speaking/ reasoned :

Yes / No

2. Whether reportable :

Yes / No SHAM SUNDER 2020.09.04 03:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Sector-1, Chandigarh