← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/12646/2026disposed of

Dr Gurjeet Singh Virdi And ANR v. State Of Punjab And Others

2026-04-27Mr. Justice Namit Kumar2 pages

CWP-12646 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12646 of 2026 Date of decision: 27.04.2026 Dr. Gurjeet Singh Virdi and another ....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR

Present:

Mr. Umesh Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Surya Kumar, AAG, Punjab.

NAMIT KUMAR , J. (ORAL) 1.

Instant petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to extend the benefit of revised pay fixation/revised salary to the petitioners as per the Bana Farid University of Health Sciences (Group-A) Service Rules, 2016 at par with the remaining 23 identically situated petitioners of CWP No.32535 of 2025 whose claims were considered under the same speaking order dated 21.01.2026 (Annexure P-2), however, the present petitioners have been excluded without any reason.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that to claim the aforesaid benefit, petitioners have served legal notice dated 10.04.2026 (Annexure P-4) upon the respondents, however, the same is still pending consideration. Learned counsel for the petitioners confines his prayer for disposing of the legal notice dated 10.04.2026 (Annexure RAVINDER SINGH 2026.04.28 09:43 I agree to specified portions of this document

CWP-12646 of 2026 P-4) and submits that at this stage, petitioners would be satisfied, if the said legal notice is considered and disposed of by passing a speaking order in a time-bound frame.

3.

Notice of motion.

4.

Mr. Surya Kumar, AAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and has no objection to the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners.

5.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record of the case.

6.

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case or the claim being made by the petitioners in the present petition, respondent No.3 is directed to consider and decide the claim made by the petitioners in the legal notice dated 10.04.2026 (Annexure P-4) in accordance with law, by passing a speaking order within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 7.

The petition stands disposed of.

27.04.2026 (NAMIT KUMAR) R.S.

JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No RAVINDER SINGH 2026.04.28 09:43 I agree to specified portions of this document