High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/7988/2017disposed of

Vaishali & ANR v. State Of Punjab And ORS

2017-03-08Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj2 pages

CRM-M-7988-2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-7988 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision : March 08, 2017 Vaishali and another ... Petitioners

VERSUS

State of Punjab and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Petitioners in person with Mr. Gaurav Pathani, Advocate for Ms. Chhavi Sharma, Advocate.

SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) This petition is for seeking protection of life and liberty of petitioners, who alleged to have married against the wishes of respondents No. 4 and 5, parents of petitioner No.1.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has limited his prayer for taking appropriate action in accordance with law on the representation dated 04.03.2017 (Annexure P-5) submitted by petitioner No.1 to Senior Superintendent of Police, SAS Nagar. It has been stated that both the petitioners are major. The date of birth of petitioner No.1-Vaishali is 13.11.1993 as per copy of Secondary School Examination Certificate (Annexure P-1) and that of petitioner No.2-Saroj Paswan is 11.07.1994 as per copy of Secondary School Examination Certificate (Annexure P-2). They got married on 04.03.2017 Photographs of marriage are Annexure P-3. In view of the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners, but without expressing any opinion on the validity of marriage of petitioners, Sachin Mehta 2017.03.08 16:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-7988-2017 -2petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, SAS Nagar to look into the representation dated 04.03.2017 (Annexure P-5) and take appropriate action in accordance with law, on receipt of copy of this order along with representation in his office. However, it is made clear that this order will have no effect on the validity of alleged marriage of the petitioners or on any other civil or criminal proceedings instituted against them. (SURINDER GUPTA) March 08, 2017.

JUDGE Sachin M.

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Sachin Mehta 2017.03.08 16:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH