Kamaal Hussain v. State Of Haryana
_________
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH Sr. No.233 CRM-M-24996-2019 Date of Decision: 11.05.2023 KAMAAL HUSSAIN .... Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present:
None for the petitioner.
Mr. P. K. Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana.
**** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Again, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Learned State counsel has further informed that out of 05 witnesses cited by the prosecution, 03 of them have already been examined. It is revealed that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner ever since 17.03.2020, despite repeated adjournments. In the aforesaid circumstances, it is clear that the petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing this petition.
Dismissed in default for want of non-prosecution. (DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE 11.05.2023 M.Sikka Whether speaking/reasoned :
Yes/No Whether reportable :
Yes/No MAMTA 2023.05.15 10:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment