← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/12684/2024disposed of

Manjul Manocha And Others v. State Of Haryana And Others

2024-07-17Mr. Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH

Sr. No.: 109 Civil Writ Petition No.12684 of 2024 Date of Decision: July 17, 2024 Manjul Manocha & others ..... PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

State of Haryana & others ..... RESPONDENT(S)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA PRESENT: - Mr. Shamsher Singh Tomar, Advocate, with Mr. Vikas Singh Chawra, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. R.S. Budhwar, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.

Tribhuvan Dahiya, J (Oral) The petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking a writ of certiorari quashing the action of the respondents for not granting the benefit of additional ten percent of the Basic Pay plus Dearness Allowance to the petitioners in compliance of the amendment dated 13.04.2022, Annexure P-4 in the Teachers Transfer Policies.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before respondent No.3. At this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case respondent No.3 is directed to decide their pending representations dated 12.05.2024, Annexure P-6, in a specific period.

3.

Learned State counsel, appearing on advance notice, submits that the pending representations, dated 12.05.2024, will be decided by respondent No.3-Director General, Department of Secondary School AVIN KUMAR 2024.07.17 18:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order.

CWP No.12684 of 2024 [2] Education, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law, within six weeks.

4.

In view thereof, without going into merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to consider and decide the pending representations, dated 12.05.2024, Annexure P-6, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. 5.

In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of ` 25,000 to the petitioner. (Tribhuvan Dahiya) Judge July 17, 2024 avin Whether Speaking/ Reasoned:

Yes/ No Whether Reportable:

Yes/ No AVIN KUMAR 2024.07.17 18:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order.