Tamanna Babbar v. Smt Anupma Malik Estate Officer - Ii

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

COCP-2117-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 29.07.2025 TAMANNA BABBAR .... Petitioner

VERSUS

SMT. ANUPMA MALIK, ESTATE OFFICER-II .... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present :

Mr. Nishant Maini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harmanjot Singh Gill, Advocate for the respondent. ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL) 1.

Learned counsel for the respondent states that an amount of ₹11,73,786, on account of delay in possession, would be refunded to the petitioner today itself and thereafter a speaking order would be passed. Written instructions received by the counsel for the respondent from the Legal Cell EO2 through an e-mail have been placed on the record. 2.

In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not wish to press the present contempt petition at this stage. However, learned counsel seeks liberty to get the same revived in case anything survives in the matter. 3.

Dismissed as not pressed at this stage, with the liberty aforesaid. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off. 29.07.2025 (ALKA SARIN) Aman Jain JUDGE NOTE:

Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: Yes/No AMAN JAIN 2025.07.30 09:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment