Sunil Bansal v. State Of Punjab And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRR No.2691 of 2016 DECIDED ON: 13.02.2019 SUNIL BANSAL ...PETITIONER...

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

...RESPONDENTS...

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present: Mr. Pawan Kumar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rozer Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Davinder Bir Singh, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Rajinder Goyal, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that respondent No.2, in compliance to impugned order dated 21.07.2016, to which, challenge has been laid in the instant petition, has already surrendered his passport after renewal. Therefore, the instant petition has rendered infructuous.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Suraj Khan, submits that petitioner has been granted anticipatory bail under the newly added Section 466 IPC.

In view of the above, instant petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.

13.02.2019 (RAMENDRA JAIN) sonika JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No SONIKA 2019.02.21 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh