Abhishek @ Pinda v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-31572-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision: 18.05.2022 ABHISHEK @ PINDA




















STATE OF HARYANA 
 



   

    
 








   
 
 
 
 
!!!!

   






"

""#

  
  $

   
#


%&

'
 

  

(

""
(


) 

  

 



*


  
"
 !



+ 









"
"
  
 
,-
%'

./.&0.0&
   


'// 1&&
-23

&.


424



&5
6


424 

"
7

"

"#
8  
9
: 
  "




*


 
"

"

*"


  
 3


*
*;

*

 <*"
#"
 

=>&

=>'
   
" 
 "
2 



 

   
 
 AMAN JAIN 2022.05.19 10:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CRM-M-31572-2021 (O&M) -2-  
 "










 ./.&0.0& Per contra, while opposing the prayer for grant of regular bail to the petitioner, learned State counsel does not dispute the custody period of the petitioner. He, however, submits that out of 15 prosecution witnesses, 10 have already been examined.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has been in custody since 07.01.2021. The victim, his mother and father/complainant (PW-1 to PW-3) have not supported the prosecution version and turned hostile. Some of the prosecution witnesses are yet to be examined. In such circumstances, the trial of the case would take a long time to conclude. Therefore, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind the bars. In view of the above and without commenting anything on the merits of the case, lest it should prejudice the case of both the sides, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court/Duty Magistrate/Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned.

" !

   

 *
9  #  


    
    AMAN JAIN 2022.05.19 10:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment