Sandeep v. State Of Haryana

Crl. Revision No. 3932 of 2014 (O&M) -1- In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Revision No. 3932 of 2014 (O&M) Date of decision: 27.2.2015 Sandeep Kumar ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA

Present:

Mr. Sanjeev Majra, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Rajiv Doon, AAG, Haryana.

**** SABINA, J.

Petitioner had faced the trial qua commission of offence punishable under Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 ('Act'' for short) in FIR No. 282 dated 13.5.2010, registered at Police Station City Kaithal. Trial Court vide judgment/order dated 13.1.2012/14.1.2012 ordered the conviction and sentence of the petitioner under Section 25 of the Act. Appeal filed by the petitioner against the said judgment/order of his conviction and sentence, was dismissed by the Appellate Court vide order dated 8.11.2013. Hence, the present petition by the petitioner. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned State counsel and have gone through the record available on the file carefully.

In the present case, petitioner was apprehended by the police officials on the basis of suspicion and on his search, a GURPREET SINGH 2015.03.04 10:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Crl. Revision No. 3932 of 2014 (O&M) -2country made pistol .315 bore, loaded with one live cartridge, was recovered. During trial, the prosecution witnesses deposed as per the prosecution case. The official witnesses were acting in discharge of their official duty and had no reason to falsely involve the petitioner in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has failed to point out any misreading of evidence by the Courts below warranting interference by this Court.

No ground for interference is made out.

Dismissed.

(SABINA) JUDGE February 27, 2015 Gurpreet GURPREET SINGH 2015.03.04 10:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh