Su Kumar Sahu v. State Of Haryana And Another
"
#$$%&'&'()%!
%*%!+%, )$ $$ !()( )-%, ) $$ . /0 .$
! "
!
"# $
%" &' !
&(
# !
) *
1 $ & !
# + # !
!
" !
!
,# *-./*.*0 + #!
* #
# # (+
# !
# !
# ! !! # " 1' ) 1 ! 0*. 0.2 023 024 03/ 5 -.2
67 ## " !! " # ! 7
#
!' +
'
!! *./* 8 *./9 " "
#
+
' !'
#
1' ) 1 !
#
!' +' !!
!! " "
# !' :
# ; *0.**./* ₹
-.....,: " " !
# < !' +
' !!
!# "+
8 "
## !' + !!## '
## ₹
# +
' " !' ! #
-......,: # ! ' " !!
!' + !' + = !! " '
!
# 9
# ! # !! "
! # & !
# > !! ) * 1' ) 1 " & # " # (
*?.3*./?
# 867 !
! !!: ! 024 5 03/
67
!
.9 ! # ₹
-...,: !
+
! ! 024 5 03/
67 + ! " !
!
!
# 0 # # +
!
" + # # 8 /*.0*.*9
! !
!
" !
!
+
! " !
+ ! !
# - ! # !
) *
+ !
+" 6 "
" (# !@ " ) * (+ A!
#B " # (#
! (# # +
+#
# (+ " + " "! " #!
+
7 *?.-*.*9 6 "
!
#!
₹ #
/-....,: + +
"! + "
) *: !
# 7 # & !
"
*?.-*.*9 1
"
# , !
*-./*.*0 + #!
1 !
#
) *:
# !
! !
! # + ! + !
# 2 6
! ! ! ! >
" 7 # !! !
!
! ! +
! :
+# !
+ & # 7 + !
+ ## 7 7.
Question as to whether proceedings can be quashed/compounded on the basis of compromise amongst the parties, once the matter has been considered by the trial Court after appreciation of evidence and conviction has been recorded, was considered at depth by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in
#
# ! "#$ % + ! !
) 9
//.0*.*9 "! " # #
## " by this Court in CRM-M-34851 of 2023 titled as Manjit Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another, decided on 18.01.2024. It was held, after referring to catena of authorities that there could be no dispute that even in the cases, where the offences are noncompoundable, but are predominantly of a private nature, the proceedings can be annulled, even if trial has concluded and even if appeal has been dismissed against conviction.
8.
In the present case, both the parties came to terms while in jail, in a private matter. Occurrence had taken place way-back in February, 2012 i.e. more 12 years back, over a private dispute. Both the parties faced a long agony of trial. Compromising the matter will help in harmonizing the relations between the parties. Having regard to all the facts and circumstances, this Court should not create any hindrance to give effect to the compromise ? 6 "
! !
(
*?.3*./? ! + 7) ) .9:..*?9/:*./0 # C(+ 5 D # " ! + # 7
+ ## !
(
/*.0*.*9 # + 7) ) ./:..49/9:*./? # C (+ D + 2
3 %4!
!5 1 )' &( = ' , E,)
=
+# E,)
) 0