Deepak v. Vinay Kumar
E HIGH COURT OF PUNJ IN THE JAB AND HARYANA ARH COCP-1818-2024 ecision: November 18, 2024 AT CHANDIGA Date of De ........Petitioner DEEPAK VINAY KUMA CORAM: HO
Present:
M M
Versus
AR ........Respondent ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARK KESH MANUJA Mr. Vinod Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Shivendra Swaroop, DAG, Haryana.
**** ANUJA, J. (ORAL) HARKESH MA Le earned State counsel submits s that order dated 19.03.2024 passed in CW WP-6516-2024 has now been n complied with by passing a a speaking orde er.
In view of the aforesaid, learn ed counsel for the petitioner r does not pres ss the present petition, howe ever, with liberty to challenge e the same in ac ccordance with law Dis smissed as not pressed with a aforesaid liberty.
Ru ule discharged.
18.11.2024 Tejwinder Whether speaking/reasone (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE ed Yes/No Yes/No Whether Reportable TEJWINDER SINGH 2024.11.19 12:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document